Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751673AbbD3B4N (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:56:13 -0400 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166]:33063 "EHLO namei.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751169AbbD3B4K (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Apr 2015 21:56:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:55:51 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris To: Casey Schaufler , Stephen Smalley , John Johansen , Kees Cook , Paul Moore cc: LSM , James Morris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Module stacking next steps In-Reply-To: <5536F260.3080201@schaufler-ca.com> Message-ID: References: <5536F260.3080201@schaufler-ca.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LRH 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 659 Lines: 23 On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through > the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What > procedure would you like to follow? What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in? Any objections or concerns? -- James Morris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/