Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752002AbbD3Eki (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:40:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:36140 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966AbbD3Ekg (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:40:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1430368833.3180.35.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?) From: Mike Galbraith To: Daniel Phillips Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tux3@tux3.org, "Theodore Ts'o" , OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:40:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <8f886f13-6550-4322-95be-93244ae61045@phunq.net> <1430274071.3363.4.camel@gmail.com> <1906f271-aa23-404b-9776-a4e2bce0c6aa@phunq.net> <1430289213.3693.3.camel@gmail.com> <1430325763.19371.41.camel@gmail.com> <1430334326.7360.25.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 807 Lines: 20 On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:12 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Btrfs appears to optimize tiny files by storing them in its big btree, > the equivalent of our itree, and Tux3 doesn't do that yet, so we are a > bit hobbled for a make load. That's not a build load, it's a git load. btrfs beat all others at the various git/quilt things I tried (since that's what I do lots of in real life), but tux3 looked quite good too. As Dave noted though, an orchard produces oodles of apples over its lifetime, these shiny new apples may lose luster over time ;-) -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/