Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:11:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:11:30 -0500 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:40680 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:11:29 -0500 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200301150119.EAA14364@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface To: zippel@linux-m68k.org (Roman Zippel) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 04:19:28 +0300 (MSK) Cc: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3E24A981.1EA03E8B@linux-m68k.org> from "Roman Zippel" at Jan 15, 3 01:21:21 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > Above scheme is not without problems either, a failing try_module_get() > suddenly gets a double meaning. Now it also means that the module might > be ready soon, please try again later, ... and btw completely useless thing, because each module user already has its own means to do serialization of this kind even when used _NOT_ as module. Somewhat overdone. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/