Message-ID: <554245E6.9000004@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:10:30 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
CC: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: Module stacking next steps
References: <5536F260.3080201@schaufler-ca.com> <alpine.LRH.2.11.1504301138120.10370@namei.org> <55419737.4000907@canonical.com> <alpine.LRH.2.11.1504302119510.19912@namei.org> <554240D9.506@schaufler-ca.com>
In-Reply-To: <554240D9.506@schaufler-ca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1611
Lines: 35

On 4/30/2015 7:48 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 4/30/2015 4:20 AM, James Morris wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
>>>>> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
>>>>> procedure would you like to follow?
>>>> What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as 
>>>> useful and necessary, and is it ready to go in?
>>>>
>>>> Any objections or concerns?
>>>>
>>> No objections, and I know there are several people interested in seeing
>>> this land.
>>>
>>> I am happy with the code, and my only concerns lie with things that this
>>> explicitly doesn't support yet (ie. larger lsm stacking, secids, ...)
>> Ok, Casey, please send an updated final version for everyone to check.
> Are you planning to update security-next soon? I think that it will
> be easier for everyone if I base it on the 4.1-rc than the 4.0-rc.
> Alternatively, I could base it on 4.0. I can do any of 'em, but I'd
> hate to have to do it more often than I have to.

Whoops! I read mail addressed directly to me before I read what goes
just to lists. I see that security-next is updated. I will have the update
ready as quickly as possible. Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/