Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753628AbbEAKaU (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 06:30:20 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:34499 "EHLO mail-lb0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753377AbbEAKaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 06:30:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1430462846-12022-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 19:30:15 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] m68k: use for_each_sg() From: Akinobu Mita To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , linux-m68k , Linux-Arch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1266 Lines: 30 2015-05-01 18:07 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven : > Hi Mita-san, > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote: >> Since m68k doesn't select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN, it is not necessary to >> use for_each_sg() in order to loop over each sg element. But this can >> help find problems with drivers that do not properly initialize their >> sg tables when CONFIG_DEBUG_SG is enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven >> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org >> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Do you want me to queue this up for v4.2, or do you want to handle these > changes yourself, together with "[PATCH] scatterlist: enable sg chaining > for all architectures"? Hi Geert, Please queue it up to your tree. As it turned out that enabling sg chaining for all architectures requires more survey, I've just started trivial works like this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/