Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:16:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:16:25 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:11926 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:16:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:23:01 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VIA C3 and random SIGTRAP or segfault Message-ID: <20030115132301.GC1475@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200301150929.h0F9T1I10444@duna48.eth.ericsson.se> <20030115122324.GC32694@codemonkey.org.uk> <200301151238.h0FCcwh11218@duna48.eth.ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301151238.h0FCcwh11218@duna48.eth.ericsson.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:38:58PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > Thanks, I'll check that out, though I'm a bit sceptical since the > crashes occur randomly not predictably, and that makes me feel it's > not because of an unimplemented instruction. > > Also what about trace/breakpoint trap? Can that be also generated by > an illegal instruction? Hmm. My theory would explain SIGILL's, but if you're seeing others as well, it could be something else. Check power supply is rated high enough, cooling, (though cooling is usually less of an issue with C3s) A run with memtest86 may also be worth trying. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/