Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752477AbbEAUWR (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 16:22:17 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:39203 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752206AbbEAUWN (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 16:22:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 21:21:55 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: Jason Cooper , Ezequiel Garcia , Andrew Lunn , Jean-Francois Moine , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: dove: Relicense the device tree under GPLv2+/X11 Message-ID: <20150501202155.GQ12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1430125744-3550-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20150428155910.GD12732@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <553FB6B4.8020401@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <553FB6B4.8020401@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 35 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:35:00PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 28.04.2015 17:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:09:04AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>The current implicit GPL only licensing on the device tree makes it > >>very impractical for other software components licensed under another > >>license. > >> > >>In order to make it easier for them to reuse our device trees, > >>relicense our device trees under a GPL/X11 dual-license. > >> > [...] > >>so I decided to keep the whole relicensing in a single patch. Please send > >>your Acked-by's in reply to this patch if you are happy with the relicensing. > > > >I normally don't include the "or later version" for my license changes > >as I've only accepted to contribute under the terms of GPLv2. > > Ok, I guess this is a NACK for GPLv2+ but an Acked-by if we limit the > GPL part to GPLv2 only? > > If so, is everybody else who already Acked the GPLv2+ part also fine > with reducing the GPL version to "version 2 only" ? Acked-by: Russell King Thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/