Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:26:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:26:10 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:34187 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:26:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:34:53 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 48GB NUMA-Q boots, with major IO-APIC hassles Message-ID: <20030115153453.GK919@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20030115105802.GQ940@holomorphy.com> <840980000.1042644279@titus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <840980000.1042644279@titus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At some point in the past, I wrote: >> (2) MAX_IO_APIC's got clobbered in the subarch cleanups. >> -- CONFIG_X86_NUMA was removed, use CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ >> -- this is greppable, folks... On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:24:40AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > That wasn't the subarch cleanups that removed it, please be careful > what you're saying. I plead not guilty to that one. Eh? You aren't doing all of them. I think we both know who did this one (with good intentions, even). At some point in the past, I wrote: >> (4) PCI bridges get misnumbered children. >> -- Brew up a PCI hook for giving child buses their bus numbers. >> -- Basically, fwd port mbligh's fix for 2.4.x more cleanly. >> -- Okay, not IO-APIC-related, but it annoys me greatly. >> -- ink is at least trying to steer me in the right direction here. On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:24:40AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Additional PCI-PCI bridges (eg starfire cards) have never been supported > in non-boot quads. It's not impossible, but don't be suprised if it > doesn't work. It should be fine once the bus numbering, io resources, and IO-APIC's are dealt with. The bus numbering stuff is out there, io resource stuff is an open question, and IO-APIC stuff looks uglier than sin (as usual). Basically, a good chunk of rotorooting appears to be necessary to assign deal with a number of IRQ sources large enough to make assign_irq_vector() wrap current_vector, possibly something as invasive as supporting non-unique vectors for irq_desc's. At some point in the past, I wrote: >> (5) Booting with notsc panic()'s. >> -- Remove tsc_disable assignment in the __setup() call. >> -- I'd be much obliged if the SMP TSC issues were at long >> -- last conclusively dealt with. Not IO-APIC-related either, >> -- but also very annoying. On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:24:40AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > You don't have PIT support compiled in, and you turned off TSC support, > leaving yourself with no timer. There's a patch in my tree to force on > PIT support for NUMA-Q. Sounds like a conclusive answer to the TSC for me. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/