Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 11:01:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
        jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, yinghai@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        dvlasenk@redhat.com, JBeulich@suse.com, slaoub@gmail.com,
        luto@amacapital.net, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, oleg@redhat.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, prarit@redhat.com,
        linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, jroedel@suse.de,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, macro@linux-mips.org,
        wangnan0@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mce: Define 'SUCCOR' cpuid bit
Message-ID: <20150503090128.GB18048@pd.tnic>
References: <1430405365-4473-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
 <1430405365-4473-2-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
 <20150501102508.GL10239@pd.tnic>
 <5543939B.9020507@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5543939B.9020507@amd.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 625
Lines: 19

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> Shall I beef up comment regarding 'overflow_recov' too?
> Something like 'overflow recovery cpuid bit indicates that overflow
> conditions are not fatal'
> would provide a better indication of the usage of the bit IMHO.

Ok.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/