Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753502AbbEDNTp (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2015 09:19:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]:38378 "EHLO mail-wi0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752768AbbEDNTi (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2015 09:19:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201505041412.46195.marex@denx.de> References: <201505011620.05512.marex@denx.de> <201505041412.46195.marex@denx.de> From: Michal Suchanek Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 15:18:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MTD: spi-nor: add flag to not use sector erase. To: Marek Vasut Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , "Rafa?? Mi??ecki" , Alison Chaiken , Ben Hutchings , Geert Uytterhoeven , "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" , "grmoore@altera.com" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1978 Lines: 56 On 4 May 2015 at 14:12, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Monday, May 04, 2015 at 01:11:03 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> Hello, > > Hi! > >> On 1 May 2015 at 16:20, Marek Vasut wrote: >> > On Friday, May 01, 2015 at 09:05:15 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> >> On 1 May 2015 at 01:13, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> I can determine it for this particular chip. However, when the vendor >> >> datasheet says the block is 64/32K it might mean that chips with this >> >> ID can have either block size. >> > >> > http://www.chingistek.com/img/Product_Files/Pm25LD010020datasheet%20v04.p >> > df page 21: >> > >> > SECTOR_ER (20h) erases 4kByte sector. >> > BLOCK_ER (d8h) erases 64kByte sector. >> > >> > http://www.gigadevice.com/product/download/366.html?locale=en_US >> > page 27-28: >> > >> > Sector Erase (SE) (20h) erases 4kByte sector >> > 64KB Block Erase (BE) (d8h) erases 64kByte sector >> >> It's pretty much the same as the datasheet I used >> http://www.elm-tech.com/en/products/spi-flash-memory/gd25q41/gd25q41.pdf >> >> It mentions both >> 32KB Block Erase (BE) (52H) >> and >> 64KB Block Erase (BE) (D8H) > > The SPI NOR framework will use 0xbe opcode, no problem. > >> So the chip probably tries its best to be compatible with any command >> set and this last patch is not needed. The memory organization table >> on page 7 is not all that reassuring, though. > > Which exact part do you refer to please ? Start of page 7 where it says sector size 32/64K in either datasheet. It can refer to both BE opcode variants being supported but it's quite unclear. Write protection seems to be calculated in 4k sectors and not blocks so the block size does not seem very relevant. Thanks Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/