Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752885AbbEEB30 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2015 21:29:26 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:50972 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752647AbbEEBXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2015 21:23:16 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Steven Rostedt" , "Pratyush Anand" Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 02:16:39 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 116/221] ftrace: Fix en(dis)able graph caller when en(dis)abling record via sysctl In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4450 Lines: 135 3.2.69-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Pratyush Anand commit 1619dc3f8f555ee1cdd3c75db3885d5715442b12 upstream. When ftrace is enabled globally through the proc interface, we must check if ftrace_graph_active is set. If it is set, then we should also pass the FTRACE_START_FUNC_RET command to ftrace_run_update_code(). Similarly, when ftrace is disabled globally through the proc interface, we must check if ftrace_graph_active is set. If it is set, then we should also pass the FTRACE_STOP_FUNC_RET command to ftrace_run_update_code(). Consider the following situation. # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled After this ftrace_enabled = 0. # echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer Since ftrace_enabled = 0, ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() is never called. # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled Now ftrace_enabled will be set to true, but still ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() will not be called, which is not desired. Further if we execute the following after this: # echo nop > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer Now since ftrace_enabled is set it will call ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller(), which causes a kernel warning on the ARM platform. On the ARM platform, when ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() is called, it checks whether the old instruction is a nop or not. If it's not a nop, then it returns an error. If it is a nop then it replaces instruction at that address with a branch to ftrace_graph_caller. ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() behaves just the opposite. Therefore, if generic ftrace code ever calls either ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() or ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() consecutively two times in a row, then it will return an error, which will cause the generic ftrace code to raise a warning. Note, x86 does not have an issue with this because the architecture specific code for ftrace_enable_ftrace_graph_caller() and ftrace_disable_ftrace_graph_caller() does not check the previous state, and calling either of these functions twice in a row has no ill effect. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4fbe64cdac0dd0e86a3bf914b0f83c0b419f146.1425666454.git.panand@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand [ removed extra if (ftrace_start_up) and defined ftrace_graph_active as 0 if CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is not set. ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c @@ -935,6 +935,12 @@ static __init void ftrace_profile_debugf static struct pid * const ftrace_swapper_pid = &init_struct_pid; +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER +static int ftrace_graph_active; +#else +# define ftrace_graph_active 0 +#endif + static loff_t ftrace_filter_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) { @@ -1810,24 +1816,36 @@ static int ftrace_shutdown(struct ftrace static void ftrace_startup_sysctl(void) { + int command; + if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled)) return; /* Force update next time */ saved_ftrace_func = NULL; /* ftrace_start_up is true if we want ftrace running */ - if (ftrace_start_up) - ftrace_run_update_code(FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS); + if (ftrace_start_up) { + command = FTRACE_UPDATE_CALLS; + if (ftrace_graph_active) + command |= FTRACE_START_FUNC_RET; + ftrace_run_update_code(command); + } } static void ftrace_shutdown_sysctl(void) { + int command; + if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled)) return; /* ftrace_start_up is true if ftrace is running */ - if (ftrace_start_up) - ftrace_run_update_code(FTRACE_DISABLE_CALLS); + if (ftrace_start_up) { + command = FTRACE_DISABLE_CALLS; + if (ftrace_graph_active) + command |= FTRACE_STOP_FUNC_RET; + ftrace_run_update_code(command); + } } static cycle_t ftrace_update_time; @@ -4044,7 +4062,6 @@ ftrace_enable_sysctl(struct ctl_table *t #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER -static int ftrace_graph_active; static struct notifier_block ftrace_suspend_notifier; int ftrace_graph_entry_stub(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/