Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756064AbbEEGP3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2015 02:15:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59756 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756025AbbEEGPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2015 02:15:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:14:23 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Baoquan He , "Li, ZhenHua" , dwmw2@infradead.org, indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, bhelgaas@google.com, doug.hatch@hp.com, jerry.hoemann@hp.com, tom.vaden@hp.com, li.zhang6@hp.com, lisa.mitchell@hp.com, billsumnerlinux@gmail.com, rwright@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel Message-ID: <20150505061423.GC31063@dhcp-128-4.nay.redhat.com> References: <1428655333-19504-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com> <20150415005731.GC19051@localhost.localdomain> <552DFB56.1070600@hp.com> <20150415064803.GF19051@localhost.localdomain> <20150424080147.GC4458@dhcp-16-116.nay.redhat.com> <20150424082528.GA23912@dhcp-128-91.nay.redhat.com> <20150424083530.GD4458@dhcp-16-116.nay.redhat.com> <20150424084957.GC23912@dhcp-128-91.nay.redhat.com> <20150504162318.GH15736@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150504162318.GH15736@8bytes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1-rc1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1027 Lines: 23 On 05/04/15 at 06:23pm, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:49:57PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > I'm more than happy to see this issue can be fixed in the patchset, I > > do not agree to add the code there with such problems. OTOH, for now > > seems there's no way to fix it. > > And that's the point. We discuss this issue and possible solutions for > years by now, and what ZhenHua implemented is what we agreed to be the > best-effort on what we can do in the kdump case with IOMMU enabled. > > Of course there are still failure scenarios left, but that is not > different from systems without any IOMMU. The failure is nothing different, but as I said in another reply the difference is we could use corrupted data to possiblly cause more failure. Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/