Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:19:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:19:08 -0500 Received: from dialup-214.156.221.203.acc50-nort-cbr.comindico.com.au ([203.221.156.214]:60166 "EHLO chimp.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:19:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3E26B364.8040402@cyberone.com.au> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:28:04 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: linux kernel mailing list , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.58-mm1 with contest References: <200301170024.00143.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Contest (0.61pre) benchmark results for 2.5.58-mm1 > >no_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 2 78 96.2 0 0.0 1.00 >2.5.56 3 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00 >2.5.57 3 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00 >2.5.58 2 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00 >2.5.58-mm1 4 79 96.2 0 0.0 1.00 >cacherun: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 2 76 98.7 0 0.0 0.97 >2.5.56 3 76 100.0 0 0.0 0.96 >2.5.57 3 76 100.0 0 0.0 0.96 >2.5.58 2 76 100.0 0 0.0 0.96 >2.5.58-mm1 4 77 97.4 0 0.0 0.97 >process_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 2 94 79.8 30 17.0 1.21 >2.5.56 3 93 80.6 29 16.1 1.18 >2.5.57 3 93 81.7 28 16.1 1.18 >2.5.58 2 92 81.5 27 15.2 1.16 >2.5.58-mm1 3 94 80.9 29 16.0 1.19 >ctar_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 133 78.9 1 3.8 1.71 >2.5.56 3 152 75.7 1 4.6 1.92 >2.5.57 3 132 79.5 1 3.8 1.67 >2.5.58 3 117 82.1 1 6.0 1.48 >2.5.58-mm1 3 109 81.7 1 4.6 1.38 >xtar_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 113 79.6 1 6.2 1.45 >2.5.56 3 111 78.4 1 6.3 1.41 >2.5.57 3 107 80.4 1 5.6 1.35 >2.5.58 3 122 80.3 1 6.6 1.54 >2.5.58-mm1 3 121 76.0 1 6.6 1.53 >io_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 126 63.5 6 12.7 1.62 >2.5.56 3 131 59.5 7 13.0 1.66 >2.5.57 5 124 64.5 5 11.3 1.57 >2.5.58 3 153 54.9 8 14.3 1.94 >2.5.58-mm1 6 156 51.3 9 14.7 1.97 >read_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 95 82.1 9 5.3 1.22 >2.5.56 3 99 80.8 6 6.1 1.25 >2.5.57 3 100 80.0 6 7.0 1.27 >2.5.58 3 96 82.3 9 5.2 1.22 >2.5.58-mm1 4 96 83.3 176189 6.2 1.22 > Something seems to have gone wrong with "Loads". > >list_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 91 84.6 0 8.8 1.17 >2.5.56 3 91 84.6 0 8.8 1.15 >2.5.57 3 91 84.6 0 8.8 1.15 >2.5.58 3 91 85.7 0 8.8 1.15 >2.5.58-mm1 2 92 83.7 0 9.8 1.16 >mem_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 116 73.3 66 1.7 1.49 >2.5.56 3 107 80.4 45 0.9 1.35 >2.5.57 3 110 80.0 47 0.9 1.39 >2.5.58 3 107 73.8 66 1.9 1.35 >2.5.58-mm1 3 104 75.0 50 1.0 1.32 >dbench_load: >Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio >2.5.55 3 117 68.4 2 16.2 1.50 >2.5.56 2 124 62.9 3 25.8 1.57 >2.5.57 3 121 64.5 3 22.3 1.53 >2.5.58 3 122 64.8 3 24.6 1.54 >2.5.58-mm1 3 118 66.9 3 22.0 1.49 > >Only statistically significant diff b/w 2.5.58 and 2.5.58-mm1 is in ctar_load >which is faster in mm1. Trend towards being faster in mem_load. > >Con > Looks good, thanks. Nick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/