Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 12:58:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, Waiman.Long@hp.com,
        borntraeger@de.ibm.com, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/spinlocks: Fix regression in spinlock contention
 detection
Message-ID: <20150505105812.GK21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1430799331-20445-1-git-send-email-tahsin@google.com>
 <20150505091714.GF21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <55489D9E.4010003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55489D9E.4010003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 558
Lines: 21

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:08:22PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> ================
> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> #define LOCK_INC 2

Note that to be completely identical to the kernel code you should've
written:

#define LOCK_INC	((unsigned int)2)

as per:

#define TICKET_LOCK_INC ((__ticket_t)__TICKET_LOCK_INC)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/