Message-ID: <5548C98C.6090908@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 15:45:48 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
CC: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function
 signature
References: <1430820761-28122-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> <5548B87B.4060103@users.sourceforge.net> <20150505130405.GA1956@opentech.at>
In-Reply-To: <20150505130405.GA1956@opentech.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 707
Lines: 22

>> How do you think about to import the result list into a database table?
> 
> working on that "re-cycling" your parameter count example
> top 10:
>     488 ssize_t != int
>     195 int != unsigned int
>     183 long != int

?

Would you like to provide a static source code analysis
directly in such a report format?
Will a drill-down into corresponding implementation details
become more interesting for the detection of further open issues?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/