Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759838AbbEEQJ5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2015 12:09:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]:33645 "EHLO mail-ig0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993362AbbEEPUR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2015 11:20:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150505052205.GS889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20150505052205.GS889@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 08:20:16 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2nMX84MYteZV_3CzfF2n3pJ2n1c Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] non-recursive pathname resolution From: Linus Torvalds To: Al Viro Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , Christoph Hellwig , Neil Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 740 Lines: 16 On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Al Viro wrote: > My apologies for the patchbomb from hell, but I really think > it needs a public review. Aside from the small nits I noted (and I guess I can even live with the bad label name as long as it never gets resurrected) it looks good. But I'd obviously like it to get as much testing/beating on as possible before merging: I'm assuming it will have gone at least through xfstests etc.. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/