Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:41:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:41:53 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:45001 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:41:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:43:10 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Ingo Molnar , Christoph Hellwig cc: Robert Love , Erich Focht , Michael Hohnbaum , Andrew Theurer , linux-kernel , lse-tech Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.58] new NUMA scheduler: fix Message-ID: <115000000.1042746190@flay> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > complex. It's the one that is aware of the global scheduling picture. For > NUMA i'd suggest two asynchronous frequencies: one intra-node frequency, > and an inter-node frequency - configured by the architecture and roughly > in the same proportion to each other as cachemiss latencies. That's exactly what's in the latest set of patches - admittedly it's a multiplier of when we run load_balance, not the tick multiplier, but that's very easy to fix. Can you check out the stuff I posted last night? I think it's somewhat cleaner ... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/