Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:31:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:31:32 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:48887 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 17:31:31 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 13/07/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <200301161814.h0GIEbb02258@linux.local> References: <200301161814.h0GIEbb02258@linux.local> To: jim.houston@attbi.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] IDE OnTrack remap for 2.5.58 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:40:24 +0000 Message-ID: <14093.1042756824@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jim.houston@attbi.com said: > +#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE) || defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_MODULE) Don't ever do that. Modules can be built later and shouldn't affect the static kernel unless it's _absolutely_ necessary. And were these weird partitioning schemes specific to IDE anyway? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/