Message-ID: <5549BFAC.2010609@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 09:15:56 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
CC: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function
 signature
References: <1430820761-28122-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
In-Reply-To: <1430820761-28122-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 729
Lines: 36

> +virtual context
> +virtual org
> +virtual report

Where do you want to reuse these variables in your SmPL scripts?


> +@match@
> +identifier f,ret;
> +position p;
> +type T1,T2;
> +@@
> +
> +T1 f(...) {
> + T2 ret;

Will it be more helpful to mark only such variable declarations
where the specified data type should be reconsidered
by a minus character or an asterisk (instead of the following
return statement)?

> +<+...
> +* return@p ret
> +;
> +...+>
> +}


Regards,
Markus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/