Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751822AbbEFKfi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 06:35:38 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:3927 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865AbbEFKfd (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 06:35:33 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,379,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="706024574" Message-ID: <1430908530.7444.145.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: autoNUMA web workload regression From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 13:35:30 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1467 Lines: 36 Hi Rik, we observe a tremendous regression between kernel version 3.16 and 3.17 (and up), and I've bisected it to this commit: a43455a sched/numa: Ensure task_numa_migrate() checks the preferred node http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a43455a1d572daf7b730fe12eb747d1e17411365 We run a Web server (nginx) on a 2-socket Haswell server and we emulate an e-Commerce Web-site. Clients send requests to the server and measure the response time. Clients load the server quite heavily - CPU utilization is more than 90% as measured with turbostat. We use Fedora 20. If I take 3.17 and revert this patch, I observe 600% or more average response time improvement comparing to vanilla 3.17. If I take 4.1-rc1 and revert this patch, I observe 300% or more average response time improvement comparing to vanilla 3.17. I asked Fengguang Wu to run LKP workloads on multiple 4 and 8 socket machines for v4.1-rc1 with and without this patch, and there seem to be no difference - all the micro-benchmarks performed similarly and the difference were withing the error range. IOW, it looks like this patch has bad effect on Web server QoS (slower response time). What do you think? Thank you! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/