Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752775AbbEFOew (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 10:34:52 -0400 Received: from mail-bn1bon0117.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.117]:39647 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbbEFOet (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 10:34:49 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 80691 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 10:34:48 EDT Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 165.204.84.221) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; arm.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; X-WSS-ID: 0NNXN5S-07-H78-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <554A2671.8020804@amd.com> Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 09:34:25 -0500 From: Suravee Suthikulanit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Murphy , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "lenb@kernel.org" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "thomas.lendacky@amd.com" , "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , "davem@davemloft.net" CC: "al.stone@linaro.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "leo.duran@amd.com" , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , "msalter@redhat.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 2/5] arm64 : Introduce support for ACPI _CCA object References: <1430838729-21572-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1430838729-21572-3-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <5549E834.1040305@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <5549E834.1040305@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.221;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(428002)(377454003)(189002)(51704005)(479174004)(43544003)(164054003)(199003)(24454002)(59896002)(87936001)(87266999)(105586002)(50986999)(2501003)(106466001)(76176999)(47776003)(65816999)(2201001)(120886001)(4001350100001)(46102003)(189998001)(5001770100001)(77096005)(36756003)(65956001)(77156002)(62966003)(33656002)(2950100001)(86362001)(64126003)(101416001)(50466002)(54356999)(23746002)(83506001)(92566002)(80316001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BLUPR02MB068;H:atltwp01.amd.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR02MB068; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001);SRVR:BLUPR02MB068;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR02MB068; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0568F32D91 X-OriginatorOrg: amd4.onmicrosoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2015 14:34:43.6116 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: fde4dada-be84-483f-92cc-e026cbee8e96 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=fde4dada-be84-483f-92cc-e026cbee8e96;Ip=[165.204.84.221];Helo=[atltwp01.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR02MB068 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1662 Lines: 54 On 5/6/2015 5:08 AM, Robin Murphy wrote: > [...] >> +static void __dummy_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, >> + dma_addr_t dev_addr, size_t size, >> + enum dma_data_direction dir) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +static void __dummy_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, >> + dma_addr_t dev_addr, size_t size, >> + enum dma_data_direction dir) >> +{ >> +} > > Minor point, but I don't see the need to have multiple dummy functions > with identical signatures - just have a generic dummy_sync_single and > assign it to both ops. > >> +static void __dummy_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, >> + struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems, >> + enum dma_data_direction dir) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +static void __dummy_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev, >> + struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems, >> + enum dma_data_direction dir) >> +{ >> +} > > Ditto here with dummy_sync_sg. Hi Robin, Good point. I'll take care of that in V3. > > I wonder if there's any argument for putting the dummy DMA ops somewhere > common, like drivers/base/dma-mapping.c? > > Robin. Hm.. If this approach will be adopted by other architectures, then it would make sense. Currently, this is only used by arm64. So, I think it is okay to leave this here for now. Thanks, Suravee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/