Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752797AbbEFPHd (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 11:07:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:33295 "EHLO mail-wg0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752646AbbEFPHb (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2015 11:07:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 17:09:49 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter To: Linus Walleij Cc: Shobhit Kumar , Alexandre Courbot , Jani Nikula , Samuel Ortiz , linux-pwm , David Airlie , Povilas Staniulis , intel-gfx , linux-kernel , dri-devel , Johan Hovold , linux-gpio , Chih-Wei Huang , Thierry Reding , Daniel Vetter , Lee Jones Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table Message-ID: <20150506150949.GM30184@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Walleij , Shobhit Kumar , Alexandre Courbot , Jani Nikula , Samuel Ortiz , linux-pwm , David Airlie , Povilas Staniulis , intel-gfx , linux-kernel , dri-devel , Johan Hovold , linux-gpio , Chih-Wei Huang , Thierry Reding , Daniel Vetter , Lee Jones References: <1430316005-16480-1-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com> <1430316005-16480-2-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 4.0.0-rc3+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1339 Lines: 32 On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar wrote: > > > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a > > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide > > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload > > > > v2: Ccing maintainers > > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz > > Cc: Linus Walleij > > Cc: Alexandre Courbot > > Cc: Thierry Reding > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot > > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems once it's reviewed. Would that be ok? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/