Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:18:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:18:00 -0500 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:29464 "EHLO mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 06:17:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 05:17:19 -0600 (CST) From: Jeff Garzik To: Andrew Morton cc: Tim Waugh , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.4.2-pre3: parport_pc init_module bug In-Reply-To: <3A8A6A42.66F727FA@uow.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > Bad patch. It should be > > > > if (r >= 0) { > > registered_parport = 1; > > if (r > 0) > > count += r; > > } > > > > If pci_register_driver returns < 0, the driver is not registered with > > the system. > > eh? > > pci_register_driver(struct pci_driver *drv) > { > struct pci_dev *dev; > int count = 0; > > list_add_tail(&drv->node, &pci_drivers); > pci_for_each_dev(dev) { > if (!pci_dev_driver(dev)) > count += pci_announce_device(drv, dev); > } > return count; > } > > Maybe you're thinking of pci_module_init? Apparently :) Oops, sorry Tim. Oh well, the new patch is a better one anyway ;) Guards against me changing pci_register_driver as such. :) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/