Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 06:03:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 06:03:53 -0500 Received: from [66.70.28.20] ([66.70.28.20]:63751 "EHLO maggie.piensasolutions.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 06:02:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:08:24 +0100 From: DervishD To: Tethys Cc: Linux-kernel Subject: Re: Changing argv[0] under Linux. Message-ID: <20030117100824.GA47@DervishD> References: <20030116130013.GE1358@DervishD> <200301161315.h0GDFLM27487@isengard.accucard.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200301161315.h0GDFLM27487@isengard.accucard.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tethys :) > > See the previous messages. I want to avoid mounting /proc. > Yes, I'd read them, but obviously missed the need to avoid /proc. Let's say that there is no need to avoid /proc, but things like those must be the last resort, because the problems they introduce are bigger than the problem they help to solve :) > I assume the idea behind this is for some very low memory embedded > device. Sounds interesting (and actually, one of the few legitimate > reasons I've seen for wanting to override argv[0]!). Yes, vcinit was designed for a reduced embedded device. And it was very interesting (well, at first...) but now the work rests in the heaven of abandonware ;))) > Without /proc, I can't think of any easy way of doing it, short of > wading through /dev/kmem :-) Ouch! ;))) Ra?l - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/