Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:28:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:28:49 -0500 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:60068 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:28:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:36:54 -0600 (CST) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Geert Uytterhoeven cc: Anders Gustafsson , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.59 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Unfortunately, the Makefile doesn't really know about the Kconfig files, > > the "source drivers/whatever/Kconfig" commands are in Kconfig, and > > duplicating them into the Makefile would be rather error-prone. > > What about learning `make depend' a bit Kconfig syntax? "make depend" is basically gone. > > Even if that was done, the Makefiles also cannot know about e.g. headers > > included into C files, so it'd die at that point. At some point I hacked a > > LD_PRELOAD library which would try to exec a "get" when open(2) fails, > > which fixes gcc, kconfig and whatnotsoever. I suppose a better solution is > > "checkout: get", though. > > Isn't all of this in .depend? In 2.5 things work differently, so no. --Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/