Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752499AbbEHJXs (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 05:23:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:34459 "EHLO mail-lb0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751113AbbEHJXp (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 05:23:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:23:46 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, drjones@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, zhichao.huang@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, r65777@freescale.com, bp@suse.de, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." , Gleb Natapov , Bharat Bhushan , Mihai Caraman , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Nadav Amit , "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC..." , open list , "open list:ABI/API" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values Message-ID: <20150508092346.GB24744@cbox> References: <1430929407-3487-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <1430929407-3487-3-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1430929407-3487-3-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2937 Lines: 78 On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:23:17PM +0100, Alex Benn?e wrote: > Currently x86, powerpc and soon arm64 use the same two architecture > specific bits for guest debug support for software and hardware > breakpoints. This makes the shared values explicit while leaving the > gate open for another architecture to use some other value if they > really really want to. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > index ab4d473..1731569 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch { > * and upper 16 bits are architecture specific. Architecture specific defines > * that ioctl is for setting hardware breakpoint or software breakpoint. > */ > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP 0x00010000 > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00020000 > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP > > /* definition of registers in kvm_run */ > struct kvm_sync_regs { > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > index d7dcef5..1438202 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -250,8 +250,8 @@ struct kvm_debug_exit_arch { > __u64 dr7; > }; > > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP 0x00010000 > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00020000 > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP > #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_DB 0x00040000 > #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_BP 0x00080000 > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > index 70ac641..3b6252e 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > @@ -570,8 +570,16 @@ struct kvm_s390_irq_state { > > /* for KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG */ > > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE 0x00000001 > -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP 0x00000002 > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE (1 << 0) > +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP (1 << 1) > + > +/* > + * Architecture specific stuff uses the top 16 bits of the field, s/stuff// > + * however there is some shared commonality for the common cases > + */ > +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP (1 << 16) > +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP (1 << 17) > + > > struct kvm_guest_debug { > __u32 control; We sort of left this discussion hanging with me expressing slight concern about the usefulness about these defines. Paolo, what are your thoughts? -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/