Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752226AbbEHLVg (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 07:21:36 -0400 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.6]:49804 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751118AbbEHLVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 07:21:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1431084080.3928.107.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 v22] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs From: Mimi Zohar To: Casey Schaufler , Kees Cook Cc: Stephen Smalley , Paul Moore , James Morris , James Morris , LSM , LKLM , Paul Moore , John Johansen , Tetsuo Handa , Eric Paris Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 07:21:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <554BCCDD.9010901@schaufler-ca.com> References: <55454539.9020204@schaufler-ca.com> <554B7AF7.7060305@schaufler-ca.com> <1431030143.3928.46.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <554BC9A6.1020907@tycho.nsa.gov> <554BCCDD.9010901@schaufler-ca.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 (3.12.10-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15050811-0021-0000-0000-00000515865C Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2319 Lines: 51 On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 13:36 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 5/7/2015 1:23 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > On 05/07/2015 04:22 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:07 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >>>> On 5/7/2015 4:37 AM, James Morris wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, 2 May 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/7 v22] LSM: Multiple concurrent LSMs > >>>>> Please add all of the Acked-by etc. from the patch review process. > >>>> For v21 I had Acks from: > >>>> > >>>> John Johansen > >>>> Tetsuo Handa > >>>> Stephen Smalley (after patch 8/7) > >>>> Kees Cook > >>>> > >>>> Would you check out v22 and supply (or not) your Acks? > >>>> > >>>> Eric, Paul, it would be reassuring if you'd chime in as well. > >>> Kubernetes has swallowed Eric whole I'm afraid, I don't think you want > >>> to wait on him to review these patches. > >>> > >>> However, it is a bit ridiculous that I haven't had time to seriously > >>> review these patches yet; I promise to take a look and send my > >>> comments/ACKs before my head hits the pillow tonight. > >> Seems to be working with SELinux, EVM and IMA enabled. I haven't tried > >> enabling an additional LSM. Casey, do you have an additional LSM for > >> testing? > > I've tested SELinux+Yama. > > The deepest "stack" you can have today is Capability+Yama+YourChoice. > You always get Capability, so you really only get to choose if you stack > Yama with something else. That's not more depth than you had before, but > the special case coding for Capability and Yama is replaced to the general > scheme. Nice cleanup! I assume this will pave the way for other small, builtin LSMs. :) I'm now running with Yama as well. While enabling Yama, I noticed a very minor issue with security/Kconfig. It permits defining Yama as the default LSM when it is stacked. Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/