Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932252AbbEHRZH (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 13:25:07 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:33262 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752835AbbEHRZD (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 13:25:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 19:25:03 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, drjones@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, zhichao.huang@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, r65777@freescale.com, bp@suse.de, Gleb Natapov , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] KVM: arm64: add trace points for guest_debug debug Message-ID: <20150508172503.GM24744@cbox> References: <1430929407-3487-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> <1430989647-22501-5-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1430989647-22501-5-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 8869 Lines: 301 On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:07:15AM +0100, Alex Benn?e wrote: > This includes trace points for: > kvm_arch_setup_guest_debug > kvm_arch_clear_guest_debug > kvm_handle_guest_debug > > I've also added some generic register setting trace events and also a > trace point to dump the array of hardware registers. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Benn?e > > --- > v3 > - add trace event for debug access. > - remove short trace #define, rename trace events > - use __print_array with fixed array instead of own func > - rationalise trace points (only one per register changed) > - add vcpu ptr to the debug_setup trace > - remove :: in prints > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c > index dc8bca8..08e1b83 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ > #include > #include > > +#include "trace.h" > + > /* These are the bits of MDSCR_EL1 we may manipulate */ > #define MDSCR_EL1_DEBUG_MASK (DBG_MDSCR_SS | \ > DBG_MDSCR_KDE | \ > @@ -44,6 +46,11 @@ static void save_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > vcpu->arch.guest_debug_state.pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu); > vcpu->arch.guest_debug_state.mdscr_el1 = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1); > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("Saved PSTATE", > + vcpu->arch.guest_debug_state.pstate); > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("Saved MDSCR_EL1", > + vcpu->arch.guest_debug_state.mdscr_el1); wouldn't it make sense to turn these into a single tracepoint with two parameters? > } > > static void restore_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -51,6 +58,10 @@ static void restore_guest_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= > (vcpu->arch.guest_debug_state.pstate & SPSR_DEBUG_MASK); > vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1) = vcpu->arch.guest_debug_state.mdscr_el1; > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("Restored PSTATE", *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu)); > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("Restored MDSCR_EL1", > + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1)); ditto > } > > /** > @@ -92,6 +103,8 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > bool trap_debug = !(vcpu->arch.debug_flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY); > > + trace_kvm_arm_setup_debug(vcpu, vcpu->guest_debug); > + > vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 = __this_cpu_read(mdcr_el2) & MDCR_EL2_HPMN_MASK; > vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= (MDCR_EL2_TPM | > MDCR_EL2_TPMCR | > @@ -121,6 +134,8 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1) &= ~DBG_MDSCR_SS; > } > > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("SPSR_EL2", *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu)); > + > /* > * HW Break/Watch points > * > @@ -138,6 +153,14 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vcpu->arch.debug_ptr = &vcpu->arch.external_debug_state; > vcpu->arch.debug_flags |= KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY; > trap_debug = true; > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_regset("BKPTS", get_num_brps(), > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_bcr[0], > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_bvr[0]); > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_regset("WAPTS", get_num_wrps(), > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_wcr[0], > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_wvr[0]); feels like this should also be a single tracepoint > } > > } else { > @@ -155,10 +178,15 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= MDCR_EL2_TDA; > else > vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 &= ~MDCR_EL2_TDA; > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("MDCR_EL2", vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2); > + trace_kvm_arm_set_dreg32("MDSCR_EL1", vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MDSCR_EL1)); > } > > void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > + trace_kvm_arm_clear_debug(vcpu->guest_debug); > + > if (vcpu->guest_debug) { > restore_guest_debug_regs(vcpu); > > @@ -169,6 +197,14 @@ void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP) { > vcpu->arch.debug_ptr = (struct kvm_guest_debug_arch *) > &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, DBGBCR0_EL1); > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_regset("BKPTS", get_num_brps(), > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_bcr[0], > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_bvr[0]); > + > + trace_kvm_arm_set_regset("WAPTS", get_num_wrps(), > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_wcr[0], > + &vcpu->arch.debug_ptr->dbg_wvr[0]); ditto > } > } > } > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c > index 68a0759..c93b95e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c > @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ static int kvm_handle_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) > u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu); > int ret = 0; > > + trace_kvm_handle_guest_debug(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), hsr); > + does this provide anything beyond the generic handle_exit tracepoint? > run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG; > run->debug.arch.hsr = hsr; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index 95f422f..ec803ad 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ > > #include "sys_regs.h" > > +#include "trace.h" > + > /* > * All of this file is extremly similar to the ARM coproc.c, but the > * types are different. My gut feeling is that it should be pretty > @@ -227,6 +229,9 @@ static bool trap_debug_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > const struct sys_reg_params *p, > const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > { > + trace_trap_debug_regs(r->reg, p->is_write, > + p->is_write?*vcpu_reg(vcpu, p->Rt):0); > + > if (vcpu->guest_debug && shadow_debug_reg(vcpu, p, r)) > return true; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/trace.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/trace.h > index 157416e9..62e6b76 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/trace.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/trace.h > @@ -44,6 +44,113 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_hvc_arm64, > __entry->vcpu_pc, __entry->r0, __entry->imm) > ); > > +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_handle_guest_debug, > + TP_PROTO(unsigned long vcpu_pc, u32 hsr), > + TP_ARGS(vcpu_pc, hsr), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(unsigned long, vcpu_pc) > + __field(u32, hsr) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->vcpu_pc = vcpu_pc; > + __entry->hsr = hsr; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("debug exception at 0x%08lx (HSR: 0x%08x)", > + __entry->vcpu_pc, __entry->hsr) > +); > + > + > +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_arm_setup_debug, > + TP_PROTO(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, __u32 guest_debug), > + TP_ARGS(vcpu, guest_debug), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(struct kvm_vcpu *, vcpu) > + __field(__u32, guest_debug) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->vcpu = vcpu; > + __entry->guest_debug = guest_debug; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("vcpu: %p, flags: 0x%08x", __entry->vcpu, __entry->guest_debug) > +); > + > +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_arm_clear_debug, > + TP_PROTO(__u32 guest_debug), > + TP_ARGS(guest_debug), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(__u32, guest_debug) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->guest_debug = guest_debug; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("flags: 0x%08x", __entry->guest_debug) > +); > + > +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_arm_set_dreg32, > + TP_PROTO(const char *name, __u32 value), > + TP_ARGS(name, value), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(const char *, name) > + __field(__u32, value) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->name = name; > + __entry->value = value; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("%s: 0x%08x", __entry->name, __entry->value) > +); > + > +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_arm_set_regset, > + TP_PROTO(const char *type, int len, __u64 *control, __u64 *value), > + TP_ARGS(type, len, control, value), > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(const char *, name) > + __field(int, len) > + __array(u64, ctrls, 16) > + __array(u64, values, 16) > + ), > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->name = type; > + __entry->len = len; > + memcpy(__entry->ctrls, control, len << 3); > + memcpy(__entry->values, value, len << 3); > + ), > + TP_printk("%d %s CTRL:%s VALUE:%s", __entry->len, __entry->name, > + __print_array(__entry->ctrls, __entry->len, sizeof(__u64)), > + __print_array(__entry->values, __entry->len, sizeof(__u64))) > +); > + > +TRACE_EVENT(trap_debug_regs, > + TP_PROTO(int reg, bool is_write, u64 write_value), > + TP_ARGS(reg, is_write, write_value), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field(int, reg) > + __field(bool, is_write) > + __field(u64, write_value) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + __entry->reg = reg; > + __entry->is_write = is_write; > + __entry->write_value = write_value; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("%s reg %d (0x%08llx)", __entry->is_write?"write to":"read from", __entry->reg, __entry->write_value) > +); > + > #endif /* _TRACE_ARM64_KVM_H */ > > #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH > -- > 2.3.5 > Thanks, -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/