Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932466AbbEHUP2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 16:15:28 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60997 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932072AbbEHUPZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 16:15:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 13:15:23 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Eric B Munson Cc: Shuah Khan , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow user to request memory to be locked on page fault Message-Id: <20150508131523.f970d13a213bca63bd6f2619@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20150508200610.GB29933@akamai.com> References: <1431113626-19153-1-git-send-email-emunson@akamai.com> <20150508124203.6679b1d35ad9555425003929@linux-foundation.org> <20150508200610.GB29933@akamai.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1959 Lines: 41 On Fri, 8 May 2015 16:06:10 -0400 Eric B Munson wrote: > On Fri, 08 May 2015, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 May 2015 15:33:43 -0400 Eric B Munson wrote: > > > > > mlock() allows a user to control page out of program memory, but this > > > comes at the cost of faulting in the entire mapping when it is > > > allocated. For large mappings where the entire area is not necessary > > > this is not ideal. > > > > > > This series introduces new flags for mmap() and mlockall() that allow a > > > user to specify that the covered are should not be paged out, but only > > > after the memory has been used the first time. > > > > Please tell us much much more about the value of these changes: the use > > cases, the behavioural improvements and performance results which the > > patchset brings to those use cases, etc. > > > > The primary use case is for mmaping large files read only. The process > knows that some of the data is necessary, but it is unlikely that the > entire file will be needed. The developer only wants to pay the cost to > read the data in once. Unfortunately developer must choose between > allowing the kernel to page in the memory as needed and guaranteeing > that the data will only be read from disk once. The first option runs > the risk of having the memory reclaimed if the system is under memory > pressure, the second forces the memory usage and startup delay when > faulting in the entire file. Why can't the application mmap only those parts of the file which it wants and mlock those? > I am working on getting startup times with and without this change for > an application, I will post them as soon as I have them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/