Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 06:22:14 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
Message-ID: <20030118062214.GB18853@bjl1.asuk.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

(Whoops, sorry Larry, it's appropriate to include l-k in To:).

Larry McVoy wrote:
> As far as I can tell your complaint is that you can't have access to
> the up to minute source view without using something which violates
> your politics.

No; my complaint is that I'm not _allowed_ to use BitKeeper.

I'll use it if you say it's ok.  Do you grant me permission?

Your license seems to request that I don't use it, because of other
programs I work on which have nothing to do with the kernel or
politics.  I'm not going to enumerate them; suffice to say I think
they fall under clause 3(d) of the bkl.  I could be mistaken.

(It seems ironic, given that you and I share an interest - in tools to
improve the software engineering process).

Thanks,
-- Jamie

ps. Yes I know it's possible to pay - if I had any money.

pps. I was also letting you know you might like to update your web
page, which is out of date.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/