Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:15:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:15:18 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:14474 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 03:15:16 -0500 Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:25:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jamie Lokier Cc: lm@bitmover.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Message-Id: <20030118002534.7b93cb4c.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030118080959.GC18969@bjl1.asuk.net> References: <20030118043309.GA18658@bjl1.asuk.net> <20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com> <20030118080959.GC18969@bjl1.asuk.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2003 08:24:09.0572 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9576240:01C2BECA] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > I guess I don't know how to help you. As far as I can tell, if Linus > > wasn't using BK he'd still be doing what he was doing up until he started > > using BK which means you wouldn't have the option of the up to date > > snapshots you can currently get. > > Oh, I agree that BK makes things possible that didn't happen before. Well. Many source management tools would give us the things we are now enjoying. The main difference is that Linus is actually using one now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/