Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752015AbbEJNxR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2015 09:53:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:34412 "EHLO mail-wg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751874AbbEJNxN (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2015 09:53:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 16:53:09 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig?= Brady Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mmarek@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tags: much faster, parallel "make tags" Message-ID: <20150510135309.GD1717@p183.telecom.by> References: <20150508132606.GA16613@p183.telecom.by> <554D9606.7090908@draigBrady.com> <20150510132633.GA1717@p183.telecom.by> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150510132633.GA1717@p183.telecom.by> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2243 Lines: 66 [fix Andrew's email] On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 04:26:34PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 06:07:18AM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote: > > On 08/05/15 14:26, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > > exuberant() > > > { > > > - all_target_sources | xargs $1 -a \ > > > + rm -f .make-tags.* > > > + > > > + all_target_sources >.make-tags.src > > > + NR_CPUS=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN 2>/dev/null || echo 1) > > > > `nproc` is simpler and available since coreutils 8.1 (2009-11-18) > > nproc was discarded because getconf is standartized. > > > > + NR_LINES=$(wc -l <.make-tags.src) > > > + NR_LINES=$((($NR_LINES + $NR_CPUS - 1) / $NR_CPUS)) > > > + > > > + split -a 6 -d -l $NR_LINES .make-tags.src .make-tags.src. > > > > `split -d -nl/$(nproc)` is simpler and available since coreutils 8.8 (2010-12-22) > > -nl/ can't count and always make first file somewhat bigger, which is > suspicious. What else it can't do right? > > > > + sort .make-tags.* >>$2 > > > + rm -f .make-tags.* > > > > Using sort --merge would speed up significantly? > > By ~1 second, yes. > > > Even faster would be to get sort to skip the header lines, avoiding the need for sed. > > It's a bit awkward and was discussed at: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2013-01/msg00027.html > > Summarising that, is if not using merge you can: > > > > tlines=$(($(wc -l < "$2") + 1)) > > tail -q -n+$tlines .make-tags.* | LC_ALL=C sort >>$2 > > > > Or if merge is appropriate then: > > > > tlines=$(($(wc -l < "$2") + 1)) > > eval "eval LC_ALL=C sort -m '<(tail -n+$tlines .make-tags.'{1..$(nproc)}')'" >>$2 > > Might as well teach ctags to do real parallel processing. > LC_* are set by top level Makefile. > > > p.p.s. You may want to `trap EXIT cleanup` to rm -f .make-tags.* > > The real question is how to kill ctags reliably. > Naive > > trap 'kill $(jobs -p); rm -f .make-tags.*' TERM INT > > doesn't work. > > Files are removed, but processes aren't. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/