Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264842AbTAROqE>; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:46:04 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264844AbTAROqE>; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:46:04 -0500
Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:52997 "EHLO
	smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264842AbTAROqD>; Sat, 18 Jan 2003 09:46:03 -0500
Message-ID: <3E296342.B3042E09@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:22:58 +0100
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.20 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
CC: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
References: <20030118043309.GA18658@bjl1.asuk.net> <20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Larry McVoy wrote:

> I guess I don't know how to help you.  As far as I can tell, if Linus
> wasn't using BK he'd still be doing what he was doing up until he started
> using BK which means you wouldn't have the option of the up to date
> snapshots you can currently get.

IOW "You should be thankful for what I offer, if you don't like it, piss
off!"
Might not be what you've intended, but that's what I arrived here and
I'm sure I'm not the only one.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/