Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752610AbbEKHn0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 03:43:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:38047 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752199AbbEKHnX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 03:43:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Valentin Rothberg Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:42:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: locking/pvqspinlock, x86: undefined CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS To: peterz@infradead.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Paul Bolle , Andreas Ruprecht , hengelein Stefan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 937 Lines: 25 Hi Peter, your commit f233f7f1581e ("locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Implement the paravirt qspinlock call patching") is in today's linux-next tree (i.e., next-20150511). The two #ifdef blocks listed below cannot be compiled at the current state since CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS does not exist: +#if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && defined(CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS) [...] +#if defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS) && defined(CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS) It seems that it's just a typo, since QUEUED_SPINLOCK (i.e., without last S) is defined in kernel/Kconfig.locks. I detected this issue with scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py by diffing today's and the previous next tree. Kind regards, Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/