Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754063AbbEKPw5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 11:52:57 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.111]:38396 "EHLO e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753964AbbEKPwt (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 11:52:49 -0400 From: David Hildenbrand To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@redhat.com, yang.shi@windriver.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, hughd@google.com, hocko@suse.cz, ralf@linux-mips.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, airlied@linux.ie, daniel.vetter@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v1 01/15] uaccess: count pagefault_disable() levels in pagefault_disabled Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:52:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1431359540-32227-2-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1431359540-32227-1-git-send-email-dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15051115-0021-0000-0000-000003DC32AA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4073 Lines: 128 Until now, pagefault_disable()/pagefault_enabled() used the preempt count to track whether in an environment with pagefaults disabled (can be queried via in_atomic()). This patch introduces a separate counter in task_struct to count the level of pagefault_disable() calls. We'll keep manipulating the preempt count to retain compatibility to existing pagefault handlers. It is now possible to verify whether in a pagefault_disable() envionment by calling pagefault_disabled(). In contrast to in_atomic() it will not be influenced by preempt_enable()/preempt_disable(). This patch is based on a patch from Ingo Molnar. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + include/linux/uaccess.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- kernel/fork.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index af01e3c..6df2790 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1792,6 +1792,7 @@ struct task_struct { #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP unsigned long task_state_change; #endif + int pagefault_disabled; }; /* Future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's cpus_allowed. */ diff --git a/include/linux/uaccess.h b/include/linux/uaccess.h index ecd3319..23290cc 100644 --- a/include/linux/uaccess.h +++ b/include/linux/uaccess.h @@ -2,20 +2,36 @@ #define __LINUX_UACCESS_H__ #include +#include #include +static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_inc(void) +{ + current->pagefault_disabled++; +} + +static __always_inline void pagefault_disabled_dec(void) +{ + current->pagefault_disabled--; + WARN_ON(current->pagefault_disabled < 0); +} + /* - * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler in that - * it will not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table. + * These routines enable/disable the pagefault handler. If disabled, it will + * not take any locks and go straight to the fixup table. + * + * We increase the preempt and the pagefault count, to be able to distinguish + * whether we run in simple atomic context or in a real pagefault_disable() + * context. + * + * For now, after pagefault_disabled() has been called, we run in atomic + * context. User access methods will not sleep. * - * They have great resemblance to the preempt_disable/enable calls - * and in fact they are identical; this is because currently there is - * no other way to make the pagefault handlers do this. So we do - * disable preemption but we don't necessarily care about that. */ static inline void pagefault_disable(void) { preempt_count_inc(); + pagefault_disabled_inc(); /* * make sure to have issued the store before a pagefault * can hit. @@ -25,18 +41,24 @@ static inline void pagefault_disable(void) static inline void pagefault_enable(void) { -#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT /* * make sure to issue those last loads/stores before enabling * the pagefault handler again. */ barrier(); + pagefault_disabled_dec(); +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT preempt_count_dec(); #else preempt_enable(); #endif } +/* + * Is the pagefault handler disabled? If so, user access methods will not sleep. + */ +#define pagefault_disabled() (current->pagefault_disabled != 0) + #ifndef ARCH_HAS_NOCACHE_UACCESS static inline unsigned long __copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(void *to, diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 2e67086..0bb88b5 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -1393,6 +1393,9 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags, p->hardirq_context = 0; p->softirq_context = 0; #endif + + p->pagefault_disabled = 0; + #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP p->lockdep_depth = 0; /* no locks held yet */ p->curr_chain_key = 0; -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/