Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753348AbbEKU2h (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 16:28:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f42.google.com ([209.85.192.42]:33644 "EHLO mail-qg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752128AbbEKU2f (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 16:28:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:28:30 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, kristen@linux.intel.com, sgunderson@bigfoot.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: Add firmware_default LPM policy Message-ID: <20150511202830.GH11388@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1429370796-5881-1-git-send-email-mjg59@coreos.com> <1429370796-5881-3-git-send-email-mjg59@coreos.com> <20150422144812.GA10592@htj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1529 Lines: 36 Hello, Matthew. On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:24:18PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Ok, I've had one person testing this report the following: > > [ 1896.902726] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x800 SErr 0x40000 action 0x0 > [ 1896.902735] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 > [ 1896.902741] ata1: SError: { CommWake } > [ 1896.902748] ata1.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED > [ 1896.902758] ata1.00: cmd 61/18:58:88:d5:5d/00:00:0d:00:00/40 tag 11 > ncq 12288 out > res 41/04:00:9f:d5:5d/00:00:0d:00:00/40 Emask 0x401 (device error) > [ 1896.902764] ata1.00: status: { DRDY ERR } > [ 1896.902768] ata1.00: error: { ABRT } > [ 1896.912725] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible > [ 1896.932716] ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible > [ 1896.942783] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 > [ 1896.942815] ata1: EH complete > > which seems to occur in batches. I'm a little confused - isn't it > legitimate for the phy to report comwake here? CommWake isn't the problem here. SError is being dumped just for information. The disk is reporting failure on a write command which is diagnosed as "device error" and thus the link is not reset. It's really the device actively reporting command failure. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/