Message-ID: <5551A2C8.1070803@xilinx.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:50:48 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
CC: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@ni.com>,
        Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <monstr@monstr.eu>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Betker <thomas.betker@rohde-schwarz.com>,
        Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
        =?windows-1252?Q?S=F6ren_?= =?windows-1252?Q?Brinkmann?= 
	<soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: Set bit 22 in PL310 AuxCtrl register (6395/1)
References: <812979c5a158a3306d8036e7f9731947c58a3ab7.1431411716.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
 <55519E47.7040008@de.bosch.com>
In-Reply-To: <55519E47.7040008@de.bosch.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2015 06:51:04.2702
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.60.83];Helo=[xsj-pvapsmtpgw01]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1AFFO11HUB029
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1059
Lines: 31

On 05/12/2015 08:31 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 12.05.2015 08:22, Michal Simek wrote:
>> From: Thomas Betker <thomas.betker@rohde-schwarz.com>
>>
>> This patch is based on the
>> commit 1a8e41cd672f ("ARM: 6395/1: VExpress: Set bit 22 in the PL310
>> (cache controller) AuxCtlr register")
> 
> 
> I've been under the impression that this shouldn't be done in the
> kernel, but in the boot loader/firmware:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/20/199
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-March/207803.html

Tegra, Exynos, sti still have this bit set.
Does that mean that they should be just removed because fix should be in
bootloader?

Anyway it is normal that bootloader stay on system untouched and only OS
is updated. But OK - let's make this in bootloader if this is preferred
solution.

Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/