Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932158AbbELJ3i (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 05:29:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40963 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932553AbbELJ26 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 05:28:58 -0400 Message-ID: <5551B848.4090606@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:22:32 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xiao Guangrong CC: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_slot_rmap_range References: <1431397953-16642-1-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> <1431397953-16642-4-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1431397953-16642-4-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1425 Lines: 52 On 12/05/2015 04:32, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > +#define for_each_slot_rmap_range(_slot_, _start_level_, _end_level_, \ > + _start_gfn, _end_gfn, _iter_) \ > + for (slot_rmap_walk_init(_iter_, _slot_, _start_level_, \ > + _end_level_, _start_gfn, _end_gfn); \ > + slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_); \ > + slot_rmap_walk_next(_iter_)) > + > + for_each_slot_rmap_range(memslot, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, > + PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES - 1, What about adding a #define for PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL (PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL + KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES - 1) ? > + gfn_start, gfn_end - 1, &iterator) > + ret |= handler(kvm, iterator.rmap, memslot, > + iterator.gfn, iterator.level, data); I prefer to indent by two tabs: for_each_slot_rmap_range(memslot, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, gfn_start, gfn_end - 1, &iterator) ret |= handler(kvm, iterator.rmap, memslot, iterator.gfn, iterator.level, data); Same in the next patch: for_each_slot_rmap_range(memslot, start_level, end_level, start_gfn, end_gfn, &iterator) { if (iterator.rmap) flush |= fn(kvm, iterator.rmap); ... } Thanks, Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/