MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150506150949.GM30184@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1430316005-16480-1-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
	<1430316005-16480-2-git-send-email-shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
	<CACRpkdbtu_J2vCZ2kKVhBX6J0Ptgx0UvbJo3jSf8s=8E2qf-mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150506150949.GM30184@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:52:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY47b6mzrSk99AQ19MnQarCCKaKqTQLejMyJjxtpjd6qA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for
 removing registered consumer lookup table
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-pwm <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Povilas Staniulis <wdmonster@gmail.com>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@android-x86.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1503
Lines: 34

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a
>> > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide
>> > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload
>> >
>> > v2: Ccing maintainers
>> >
>> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
>> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the
> same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just
> those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems
> once it's reviewed. Would that be ok?

That's an immutable branch I guess, and yeah I think it's OK.
I usually only pull these in if/when there are conflicts in -next.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/