Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932329AbbELKtD (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 06:49:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:33644 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753248AbbELKs7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 06:48:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Valentin Rothberg Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:48:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX To: Linus Walleij Cc: Joachim Eastwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Paul Bolle , hengelein Stefan , Andreas Ruprecht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1058 Lines: 34 Hi Linus, On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Valentin Rothberg > wrote: > >> Hi Joachim, >> >> there are two of your commits [1, 2] in today's linux-next (i.e., >> next-20150506). Both of them add Kconfig options that depend on >> ARCH_LPC18XX, which is not defined in Kconfig, see: >> >> + depends on OF && (ARCH_LPC18XX || COMPILE_TEST) >> >> Is there a patch queued somewhere to add ARCH_LPC18XX ? > > Yes, and in this case it solves more problems to merge these > patches out-of-order than not to. Could you explain those problems? I have some research interest in such cases and want to understand and identify reasons for such things. Kind regards, Valentin > Yours, > Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/