Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932575AbbELLqW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 07:46:22 -0400 Received: from blu004-omc1s5.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.16]:58376 "EHLO BLU004-OMC1S5.hotmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932340AbbELLqT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 07:46:19 -0400 X-TMN: [V8zvokNZl6D5PP2j0kGygDt1ua43X9D2] X-Originating-Email: [xili_gchen_5257@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 19:46:10 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Cree , rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, "mattst88@gmail.com" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] alpha: Wire up missing syscalls References: <20150512085952.GC5711@tower> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2015 11:46:17.0321 (UTC) FILETIME=[41B0C590:01D08CA9] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2327 Lines: 59 On 05/12/2015 07:40 PM, Chen Gang wrote: > On 05/12/2015 04:59 PM, Michael Cree wrote: >> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:33:36AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>> The related warnings: >>> >>> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh >>> :1238:2: warning: #warning syscall seccomp not implemented [-Wcpp] >>> :1241:2: warning: #warning syscall getrandom not implemented [-Wcpp] >>> :1244:2: warning: #warning syscall memfd_create not implemented [-Wcpp] >>> :1247:2: warning: #warning syscall bpf not implemented [-Wcpp] >>> :1250:2: warning: #warning syscall execveat not implemented [-Wcpp] >> >> Chen: Have you tested the syscalls you have wired up? >> > > Sorry, no, I didn't. > >> I have a suspicion that more is required to wire up the seccomp >> syscall. At least some of the other older architectures had to >> implement some extra arch dependent support to implement the seccomp >> syscall. I don't know whether this is necessary or not on Alpha so >> was wondering if this has been considered? >> > > At present, I guess (I did not test), it will lead to sys_ni_call(), so > it is really only "wire up". > >> Matt: are you still feeding Alpha patches to Linus? I suspect there >> might be a few other patches other than this one submitted to >> linux-alpha that should be applied. >> > > I found another issue when building alpha, I guess, it is valuable to be > fixed (or there was already related patch but did not submitted?): > It is only a building issue, not a bug (for me, it is valuable to be fixed: only move "kts.tv_nsec *= 1000" to "if (tv) { ... }"). > arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c: In function ?SyS_osf_settimeofday?: > arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c:1028:14: warning: ?kts.tv_nsec? may be > used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] > kts.tv_nsec *= 1000; > ^ > arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c:1016:18: note: ?kts? was declared here > struct timespec kts; > ^ Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/