Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932729AbbELMGm (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 08:06:42 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:36710 "EHLO mail-oi0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932675AbbELMGf (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 08:06:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:06:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX From: Linus Walleij To: Valentin Rothberg Cc: Joachim Eastwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , Paul Bolle , hengelein Stefan , Andreas Ruprecht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 18 On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > - (B) Creating an immutable branch pulled into both trees, which > is better since it means the same hash is in both trees PS: This may seem idea but it's not. It means several subsystem-disparate patches will appear in several pull requests and you have to explain why it's so to Linus (the big penguin, not me). So again, orthogonal trees are preferred, if possible. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/