Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261934AbTASSqn>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:46:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262500AbTASSqn>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:46:43 -0500
Received: from bjl1.asuk.net.64.29.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.29.64.88]:43215 "EHLO
	bjl1.asuk.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261934AbTASSqm>;
	Sun, 19 Jan 2003 13:46:42 -0500
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 18:55:45 +0000
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
Message-ID: <20030119185545.GA28067@bjl1.asuk.net>
References: <20030118043309.GA18658@bjl1.asuk.net> <20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com> <3E296342.B3042E09@linux-m68k.org> <20030119113902.D1594@schatzie.adilger.int>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030119113902.D1594@schatzie.adilger.int>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> That's what he intended, and rightfully so.  You now have things you didn't
> have before (i.e. hourly snapshots of Linus' tree) and you still aren't
> happy.  I guess some people will never be happy with anything, so there is
> no point in trying to appease them.

Hey, I only asked, and I made it clear what I would be happy with.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/