Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:37:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:37:02 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:54289 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:37:01 -0500 Message-ID: <3E2B1DA7.CAA76FFF@linux-m68k.org> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:50:32 +0100 From: Roman Zippel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Dilger CC: Larry McVoy , Jamie Lokier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? References: <20030118043309.GA18658@bjl1.asuk.net> <20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com> <3E296342.B3042E09@linux-m68k.org> <20030119113902.D1594@schatzie.adilger.int> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > IOW "You should be thankful for what I offer, if you don't like it, piss > > off!" Might not be what you've intended, but that's what I arrived here and > > I'm sure I'm not the only one. > > That's what he intended, and rightfully so. I just wanted to make sure I understood correctly, I have an appropriate answer, but I can't word it as nicely as Larry. > You now have things you didn't > have before (i.e. hourly snapshots of Linus' tree) and you still aren't > happy. I guess some people will never be happy with anything, so there is > no point in trying to appease them. If you don't see the problem, maybe you should read /usr/src/linux/COPYING again for a change. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/