Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:34:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:34:20 -0500 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:8714 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:34:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:43:20 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Russell Coker Cc: "Stephen D. Smalley" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add LSM sysctl hook to 2.5.59 Message-ID: <20030120004320.A10659@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Russell Coker , "Stephen D. Smalley" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com References: <200301172154.QAA00757@moss-shockers.ncsc.mil> <20030120000853.A9023@infradead.org> <200301200139.39092.russell@coker.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200301200139.39092.russell@coker.com.au>; from russell@coker.com.au on Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:39:39AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:39:39AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: > > What's the reason you can't just live with DAC for sysctls? > > What exactly do you mean by "live with DAC" in this context? If you mean > "allow UID==0 processes to do whatever they like" then it's not going to work > for any sort of chroot setup. This means check the unix file permissions / ACLs only overriden by CAP_FOWNER processes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/