Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754175AbbEMHxP (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 03:53:15 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48767 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752892AbbEMHxM (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 03:53:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:53:10 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Juergen Gross Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , target-devel , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , Hannes Reinecke , Sagi Grimberg , Nicholas Bellinger Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] target: Convert se_portal_group->tpg_lun_list[] to RCU hlist Message-ID: <20150513075310.GA23580@lst.de> References: <1431422736-29125-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> <1431422736-29125-10-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> <20150513062458.GA21426@lst.de> <5552FB9C.7000704@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5552FB9C.7000704@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1768 Lines: 37 On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:22:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> The Xen usage also looks really weird. Maybe Juergen can explain what >> scsiback_add_translation_entry is trying to do? > > scsiback_add_translation_entry() makes the connection between a pvSCSI > LUN configured by the xen tools in xenstore and a xen-scsiback target. > > The xen tools specify the pvSCSI LUN via :, with > being either the WWN of the target or an alias of that target specified > in config_fs. > > scsiback_add_translation_entry() searches all it's targets until a match > is found and links the found tpg to the device specification of the xen > guest. > >> Note that I think both >> sbp and xen really should be working on node ACLs. Right now both >> of them oly supported autogenerated ACLs, so in practice it doesn't >> matter, but keeping the data structure use clean is a goal on it's own. > > I'd be fine with this, but I think I'll need some hints how to achieve > this. I guess I have to specify .fabric_make_nodeacl and > .fabric_drop_nodeacl like e.g. done in drivers/vhost/scsi.c ? Is there > anything else I have to consider? I don't think that model works to well for Xen, at it assumes we get someone to mkdir/rmdir on configfs to create / delete ACLs, while for Xen we get this through in-kernel through a management channel. So I guess you need to export the raw core_tpg_add_initiator_node_acl and core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl functions again and call them in response to the Xenbus events. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/