Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754199AbbEMIEm (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 04:04:42 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:65288 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752970AbbEMIEh (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 04:04:37 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Ed Cashin Cc: y2038@lists.linaro.org, Tina Ruchandani , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH] aoe: Use 64-bit timestamp in frame Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:04:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8535976.TAdvFKB2bQ@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5552A778.6070603@acm.org> References: <20150511023505.GA2714@tinar> <2349651.fBUtehr528@wuerfel> <5552A778.6070603@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Hzra9K6gVy43eanA6rEuT+JCBLgVDrdOzBUiYwWEECYaRxacPFu xNbmwg/7h9cjQxp/dR6uHN1w9MJYzmdd+ZPLb6842izgSKVbMKkvnqe82tfAY/89cqjlqB+ SH/pjmlHL6HcRBctEGqCrQxHndxFzhdc3QvFZ4XlRtAfMRuoBRyIP7s63W8hRv5PEGNkVdy OujlQdSY3xsgJu4gCI6Vw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2937 Lines: 62 On Tuesday 12 May 2015 21:23:04 Ed Cashin wrote: > On 05/12/2015 07:14 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:44:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> There are of course multiple ways to do this. One way would be to > >> change the code to work on 32-bit nanoseconds instead of 32-bit > >> microseconds. This requires proving that the we cannot exceed > >> 4.29 seconds of round-trip time in calc_rttavg(). > >> Is that a valid assumption or not? > >> > >> If not, we could replace do_gettimeofday() with ktime_get_ts64(). > >> This will ensure we don't need a 64-bit division when converting > >> the ts64 to a 32-bit microsecond value, and combined with the > >> conversion is still no slower than do_gettimeofday(), and it > >> still avoids the double bookkeeping because it uses a monotonic > >> timebase that is robust against settimeofday. > > Two other approaches that occurred to me later: > > > > - introduce common ktime_get_ms(), ktime_get_us(), ktime_get_real_ms() > > and ktime_get_real_is() interfaces, to match the other interfaces > > we already provide. These could be done as efficiently or better > > than what aoe does manually today. > > > > - change the timebase that is used for the computations in aoe to use > > scaled nanoseconds instead of microseconds. Using > > > > u32 time = ktime_get_ns() >> 10; > > > > would give you a similar range and precision as microseconds, but > > completely avoid integer division. You could also use a different > > shift value to either extend the range beyond 71 minutes, or the > > extend the precision to something below a microsecond. This would > > be the most efficient implementation, but also require significant > > changes to the driver. > > > > That is an interesting idea. People do care about aoe_deadsecs being > pretty accurate, so there would need to be a way to make that remain > accurate. The driver will fail outstanding I/O to the target and mark it > as "down" after unsuccessfully retransmitting commands to the target > for a number of seconds equal to aoe_deadsecs. > > As to the efficient ktime_get_us idea, that sounds appealing since you > mention that they would be efficient. > > Thanks for the analysis. Shall we do the ktime_get_us() approach then? It still requires a 32-bit division like do_gettimeofday(), so it will not be as efficient as the shifted nanoseconds. As for the aoe_deadsecs computation, converting the aoe_deadsec module parameter into scaled nanoseconds can be done at module load time, and that way you also save the integer division you currently do for each frame in rexmit_timer() to turn the microseconds into seconds. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/