Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:45:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:45:14 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:8390 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:44:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 12:51:00 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Wolfgang Fritz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: swsuspend: possible with VIA Eden processor? Or alternatives? Message-ID: <20030120125100.GA27330@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Wolfgang Fritz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:14:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Fritz wrote: > Hi, > > the swsuspend mini howto says that a processor with pse/pse36 feature is > required for swsupend in 2.4. > > So I am obviously out of luck with 2.4 kernels, but what about 2.5 (the > mini-howto is silent here)? >From include/asm-i386/suspend.h static inline void arch_prepare_suspend(void) { if (!cpu_has_pse) panic("pse required"); } There's really no requirement that you *need* PSE to be able to do suspend, but it seems no-one has stepped forward to write the necessary code to support non-PSE afaics. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/