Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965211AbbEMNGa (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 09:06:30 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:33215 "EHLO mail-oi0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933795AbbEMNG1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 09:06:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:06:26 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7R7ShsJYYoinAUcYjVZzQR_ANAM Message-ID: Subject: Overalyfs regression in 4.0 From: Josh Boyer To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Vincent Batts , David Howells , linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 864 Lines: 21 Hi Miklos, Vincent reported[1] what appears to be a regression in Overlayfs with 4.0. This was found in the upstream docker community[2] on Ubuntu with 4.0.1 as well, so it is distro agnostic. The following sequence of commands in the bug report seems to allow one to remove a non-empty directory. Is this expected behavior now? I looked through the commits in 4.0 and saw a few that might lead to a behavior change, but I am not familiar enough with Overalyfs to know if this was intentional or not. josh [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220915 [2] https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/13108 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/