Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965191AbbEMN6X (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 09:58:23 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:53169 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964932AbbEMN6N (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 09:58:13 -0400 X-Listener-Flag: 11101 Message-ID: <1431525483.25254.14.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: mediatek: Add spi bus for Mediatek MT8173 From: Yingjoe Chen To: Mark Brown CC: leilk liu , Mark Rutland , , , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Hongzhou Yang , Catalin Marinas , Sascha Hauer , "Will Deacon" , , , Rob Herring , , Sascha Hauer , Kumar Gala , Matthias Brugger , Eddie Huang , Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 21:58:03 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20150513111051.GH3066@sirena.org.uk> References: <1431075343-7887-1-git-send-email-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> <1431075343-7887-3-git-send-email-leilk.liu@mediatek.com> <20150508175306.GG2761@sirena.org.uk> <1431434356.2128.9.camel@mhfsdcap03> <20150512160540.GB3066@sirena.org.uk> <1431509166.25254.12.camel@mtksdaap41> <20150513111051.GH3066@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1935 Lines: 49 On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 12:10 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:26:06PM +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:05 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > There were three compatible strings listed in the DT binding but only > > > > > two here. > > > > > And I test it's ok on MT8135 platform. So I add struct of_device_id > > > > mtk_spi_of_match like this in spi driver code. > > > > You should list all the compatibles documented in the binding here, if > > > some of them are the same just have them map to a single constant. > > > Just for clarification. If we want to add spi support for a new soc, say > > mt8127, which we think is compatible to mt6589. Since it may turn out we > > need special handling for this soc latter, it is suggested to write > > compatible like this in mt8127.dtsi: > > > compatible = "mediatek,mt8127-spi", > > "mediatek,mt6589-spi"; > > > Device tree binding should list all possible compatible string in .dts, > > so we'll have to add that to binding as well. > > > - mediatek,mt6589-spi: for mt6589 platforms > > + - mediatek,mt8127-spi: for mt8127 platforms > > > Then we'll also need to add this to source code to reflect this. > > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6589-spi", .data = (void *)COMPAT_MT6589}, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8127-spi", .data = (void *)COMPAT_MT6589}, > > > This seems to introduce lots of trivial patches just to add a compatible > > device to me... > > Yes, but that's how DT works and as you say these patches are all > trivial so it's not like they take any appreciable effort. Yes, that's shouldn't be a big effort. Thanks for clarification. Joe.C -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/